When you think of voting in crypto, you probably picture one token = one vote. But that system lets big holders run the show. Quadratic voting, a voting system designed to give equal voice to small participants while limiting the power of large ones. It's not just theory—DAOs like Gitcoin and Aragon are already using it to make fairer decisions on funding, upgrades, and rules. Unlike traditional voting, where buying 100 tokens gives you 100 votes, quadratic voting makes each additional vote cost more. One vote costs 1 token, two votes cost 4 tokens, three cost 9, and so on. That means a whale with 10,000 tokens can’t just buy 10,000 votes—they’d need to spend 100 million tokens to do it. That’s impossible. So even someone with just 10 tokens can have a real say if they team up with others.
This system flips the script on DAO governance, the way decentralized organizations make collective choices using blockchain-based tools. Decentralized autonomous organizations were supposed to be democratic, but most used simple token-weighted voting. That led to outcomes favoring the richest wallets. Token voting, the standard method where voting power is tied directly to token holdings created centralization risks. Quadratic voting fixes that by rewarding participation over wealth. It’s not perfect—some argue it’s harder to understand or can be gamed—but it’s the most promising alternative we have right now. Projects using it report higher community engagement and more diverse proposals getting traction.
It also connects to how blockchain governance, the process of evolving protocols without central control works in practice. When a protocol needs a new feature, should the biggest investor decide? Or should thousands of small users, each with limited tokens, shape the future? Quadratic voting answers that by letting everyone contribute meaningfully. You see this in action in funding rounds for public goods—like open-source devs or infrastructure tools—where Gitcoin uses quadratic funding (a cousin of quadratic voting) to distribute grants. It’s not about who has the most money. It’s about who cares the most.
What you’ll find below are real examples of how quadratic voting is being tested, where it’s working, where it’s failing, and what you need to know if you’re part of a DAO. No fluff. Just what’s happening now in crypto governance—and why it affects every holder, not just the whales.
Learn how proposal creation and voting work in DAOs, including token-weighted, quadratic, and conviction voting. Understand quorums, timelocks, tools like Snapshot, and why low participation is the biggest challenge.
View more